Health Care Legislation – Hate it or Love it?

On March 23rd, President Barack Obama signed into law, a major healthcare reform legislation, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (HR 3590), following the passage of the bill by the House of Representatives on March 21st by a vote of 219 to 212, which was the previously passed healthcare legislation by the US Senate. The House also passed a second bill on Mar. 21, the so-called “fixer bill,” Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 (HR 4872), which modifies certain provisions of the newly passed legislation and which has moved to the Senate for consideration.

While I was pleased that President Obama and the Democrats were finally able to deliver much needed reform to an ailing American healthcare system, the compromises that were made to pass the bill are troubling.

  • First, language allowing reimportation of lower cost drugs from Canada and other developed nations was eliminated from the bill.
  • Second, the provisions allowing the contentious 12 year data exclusivity provision for generic versions of biologic and biotechnology drugs remained in the final bill.
  • Finally, and perhaps most importantly, any language alluding to or implying that the US government, may, in the future, be able to negotiate or regulate drug prices was obliterated.

In short, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries received all of the assurances and guarantees that were in the deal brokered by Billy Tauzin, the former head of the lobbying group PhRMA, between the White House and PhRMA over a year ago. Surprisingly, Tauzin was fired by PhRMA several weeks ago because its leadership mistakenly thought that Tauzin conceded “too much” to the Obama Administration when he brokered the original health reform package with the White House. (At the time that Tauzin was fired, health care reform legislation appeared to be on life support and all but dead).

In the final analysis, big pharma and biotech will give back $85 billion over ten years —largely by agreeing to give back some of the profits it was allowed to be collected from the egregiously flawed Medicare Part D legislation passed during the odious Bush Administration.  While $85 billion may seem like a lot (to the average American citizen) to give back, it is important to note, that the size of the global pharmaceutical and biotechnology markets is over $600 billion per year.  Although growth in these markets is beginning to slow in developed nations like the US and Japan (to high single digits), it is beginning to explode in heavily populated developing nations like China, India and Brazil where it is roughly 12-18%.  But simply, despite assertions to the contrary, business in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical markets is booming and likely to continue for the foreseeable future.

In other words, the newly passed healthcare reform legislation is a “sweetheart deal” for the US life sciences industry (YIPPEEE FOR THE BIOTECH SIDE OF ME!).

Ironically, while the healthcare reform bill insures that almost all Americans will be entitled to healthcare coverage and that insurance companies cannot deny healthcare benefits to persons with pre-existing medical conditions, the legislation may actually limit the access of Americans to potentially life-saving biotechnology drugs. This is because the 12 year data exclusivity period for generic versions of branded, biotechnology drugs (otherwise know as follow-on biologics or biosimilars) remained in the final version of the healthcare reform bill.

This provision disallows approval of follow-on biologics for a period of 12 years from the data that the original biologic received US regulatory approval.  For example, if a branded biologic or biotechnology product garners US regulatory approval in 2010, the earliest date that a generic version of this product would be able to appear on the US market would be 2022.  Moreover, in some instances, the 12 year data exclusivity provision may extend the so-called patent life of a product. Using the example above, if the patents protecting the product happen to expire in 2019, the innovator company is guaranteed an additional three years of marketing exclusivity before generic versions of the product can appear on the US market.  Finally, the 12 year data exclusivity provision effectively prevents foreign biosimilar manufacturers from competing in the US biotechnology market until about 2018; a strategy designed to allow the US to maintain its dominance of the global biotechnology market.  Interestingly, despite the approval of six or more biosimilars in Europe, these products have failed to catch on and are not able to compete with their branded, innovator counterparts.

My thoughts if I were in the shoes of a physician:

“I should quit being a physician, and file for unemployment.  This way I would earn more to take care of my expenses.” – Quote from my amazing, great sister.

There are tons of articles out there that cover the pain from the current medical practitioners out there, and there are countless quotes from physicians in regards to the new health care legislation.  In all seriousness, their jobs definitely did get tougher.

Here’s a great recent article that sums it up.

The current public that are ignorantly saying that doctors are overpaid (frick – athletes and hollywood are overpaid, and there should be some new tax law that attacks the entertainment industry) – really need to put themselves in their shoes.  The current reimbursement rates and endless red tape forces many primary care physicians to hire more staff and see more patients in order to cover their costs. Their costs continue to rise, driven by rising malpractice premiums and payroll and small business taxes and fees.  Several physicians have held their own paychecks for several months in order to make payroll.  Also, we’re not forgetting the several hundreds of thousands of medical student loans to pay back.

This bill is extremely penalizing the people who are out to save lives, and I completely understand their pain.  I’ve spent countless amount of days working and shadowing doctors in clinic – and realistically, they already have an extreme patient load.  There were days where we had one patient chart after another for 10 straight hours without having a proper break.

In conclusion, I laud President Obama’s persistence and give him props for his ability to deliver (as promised) health reform to the American public. I have no doubt that the legislation will help to improve the delivery of healthcare in the US and hopefully improve the overall health of Americans. However, while the new healthcare reform legislation is a first, positive step, the American healthcare system will never entirely be “fixed’ until healthcare practitioners are not penalized in all ends including malpractice insurance, and until US drug prices are regulated—like they are in the rest of the world.

My Urban Nerd readers – what are your thoughts?

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to MySpace

The Traveling Nerds

Myself and Rishi (www.rishiray.com) have been traveling A LOT recently.  So we decided to make some fun and informative blogs and videos about our travels.

This video was made on Monday before my red-eye flight to NYC that night, and I did not get a chance to edit the video until last night due to all the hectic meetings I have been having.

The videos will be the first of many, and remember you can be doing the same by signing up for a FREE account here!

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to MySpace

Texas to the Big Ten?

Tom Keegan of the Lawrence Journal-World & News reports that the Big Ten and University of Texas Longhorns have had “preliminary exchanges” regarding the Longhorns joining the conference, as the Big Ten looks to expand.

As Keegan notes, “Getting TV sets in the massive state of Texas tuned to the Big Ten Network would qualify as a home run for the Big Ten.”

Being a Buckeye – I don’t mind this happening, but here are the pros and cons for Texas & Big Ten- it would be all pros for the Big Ten in the end.

Pros for Texas:

1. Revenue.  If Texas joins, they make ALOT of money than they are now with the Big 12.  Texas would get to split the money from the TV contracts that the Big 10 gets, which they currently are not getting with the Big 12.  Texas gets $10 million/year from the Big 12, the worst Big 10 team gets $16 million – and that number only goes up if Texas joins because they would increase the network of viewers ALOT. They have a great monetary incentive to join. Right now, Texas is carrying the Big 12 – they don’t need to be there.

2. Academics & Prestige.  Athletics is only about 5% of the University’s budget.  Big 10 is far better in academics than the Big 12.  They would receive more funding through the Big 10, which would increase their research sources and would force them to compete academically.  Also, they would become part of the Big 10 Academic Research Program which includes University of Chicago.  This would be a big deal for Texas academically.

3. More funding for the other sports programs in Texas.  Texas would be joining a Big 10 program that is extremely competitive in other sports as well.

Pros for Big Ten:

1. Revenue.  Texas would just bring in a lot of money, viewers and network contracts.

2. We can finally divide the conference to West and East, and have a conference championship game.  West would include Texas, Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, and Northwestern. East would include Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Indiana, Ohio State, and Penn State.

3. Recruiting.  Big Ten would get more access to recruit in the state of Texas, which produces ALOT of football stars.

4. Big Ten would officially become a powerhouse and finally obtain the respect it currently deserves even though Big 10 did well in the bowl games this past season.

Cons for Texas:

1. Rivalries.  They would lose their rivalry with Oklahoma, that they have had for many, many years.  Fans and the state of Texas would be extremely upset with this.

2. They’re at the top of the Big 12.  The Big 12 would fall apart if Texas leaves.

3. Proximity and Logistics?  Some people would say that it wouldn’t make sense logistically.  I disagree.  Proximity means nothing anymore. The ACC goes from Florida to Massachusetts. The Big East extends from Milwaukee to South Florida. Even smaller conferences don’t care. The Sun Belt extends all across the country, from Denver to Florida. There’s also the Summit, which has members in Utah, North & South Dakota, Indiana, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri and Oklahoma.

My opinion, besides fans and the people of Texas being upset – I believe the Pros extremely outweigh the Cons if Texas goes to the Big 10.  Most importantly, Texas would really BENEFIT academically if they join the Big 10.  This would benefit all their programs regardless of the athletics, and this would be a wise decision for the University not considering sports.  For the university, academics will be more important than the athletics program.  Regardless, the athletic program would also benefit as well monetary wise, and I don’t see them losing fans.

The only thing that would worry me is that The Ohio State won’t easily be on top of the Big 10, but I do love some competition.

What do you guys think?

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to MySpace

The Market Focus: Toyota

So a few of us here at The Urban Nerd will randomly have some thoughts on the current market, but with a focus on certain companies.  Today’s focus will be on Toyota.

If you have not heard yet, but Toyota has recalled about 2.3 million cars in the US due to a situation that the gas acceleration pedal was sticking. The cars that were recalled were: 2009-10 RAV4 crossovers, 2009-10 Corollas, 2009-10 Matrix hatchbacks, 2005-10 Avalons, 2007-10 Camrys, 2010 Highlander crossovers, 2007-10 Tundra pickups and 2008-10 Sequoia SUVs.

Toyota said the sticking gas pedal situation is unusual and “generally does not occur suddenly. In the rare instances where it does occur, the vehicle can be controlled with firm and steady application of the brakes.”

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told Toyota owners Wednesday they should stop driving their vehicles, then quickly took back his words, adding to confusion over the safety of millions of recalled cars. Toyota, for its part, tried to reassure drivers that sticky gas pedals have been rare — and the cars can be stopped in any event by firmly stepping on the brakes.

The final word from LaHood: “What I meant to say or what I thought I said was, if you own one of these cars or if you’re in doubt, take it to the dealer and they’re going to fix it.”

The back-and-forth played out as word surfaced that Toyota Motor Corp. also has been the subject of more than 100 complaints in the U.S. and Japan about brake problems with the popular Prius gas-electric hybrid, which is not part of the recall. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has received about 100 complaints, two of them involving crashes that resulted in injuries. In addition, Japan’s transport ministry said it had received 14 complaints.

Here are my thoughts:

So we were worried about driving cars that took up a lot of fuel, and then we had the cash for clunkers deal – where we traded in our cars for more fuel efficient cars such as Toyota.  So let me say this again – we traded in our cars so we can get KILLED WITH THE NEW ONES!!!

Toyota being the lead in the the automobile market in the US, will be taking a HIT in the market.  If I were Jim Cramer, I would be yelling “SELL SELL SELL.”  Toyota which was trading at $80 a share 2 days ago is now at $71.90.  I would say that TM stocks will dip a bit lower for the next few days, but I don’t see them taking a tumble down.  Maybe when it bottoms out after this whole recall – probably best time to invest in TM longterm.

Who knows – What are your thoughts?

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to MySpace